WebBOONCHAI CHINDARAH et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. PICK UP STIX, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents. G037190 (Super. Ct. No. 03CC03896) ... In February … WebBoonchai Chindarah v. Pick Up Stix. Leave a reply. Filed 2/26/09. CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. ... v. PICK UP STIX, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents. G037190 (Super. Ct. No. 03CC03896) O P I N I O N. Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, …
Re: Kyle Pulli v. Pony International, LLC - MoreLaw
WebAffirming summary judgment in favor of the employer in a class action involving unpaid overtime claims, the California Court of Appeal has held that the Labor Code did not … WebThe Chindarah plaintiff's moved for summary adjudication of the cross-complaint, claiming the releases they signed were void under Labor Code sections 206 and 206.5. Stix … greek slaves were owned by
CHINDARAH v. PICK UP STIX, INC 171 Cal.App.4th 796
WebIn Chindarah v. Pick Up Stix, Inc. (2009) 171 Cal.App.4th 796, 801 (Chindarah), the Court of Appeal reviewed the legislative history of section 206.5 and explained the purpose of the statute as follows: WebAug 31, 2009 · A California appellate court recently provided some welcome clarification to an issue of great importance to private employers, affirming the enforceability of an employee's release of claims for unpaid wages. The decision, issued on February 26, 2009, is Chindarah v. Pick Up Stix, Inc. WebJul 27, 2009 · Chindarah v. Pick up Stix concerned California Labor Code section 206.5, which prohibits agreements purporting to release claims for wages concededly due. Pick Up Stix had been sued in a putative class action alleging it had improperly classified its general managers and assistant general managers as exempt from overtime pay. flower delivery in pimpri chinchwad